April 13, 2017

By seeking what’s truly Good that a being can be unified

Robert Wallace Apr 13, 2017
Hi Jo,

You write:

I am not quite sure what oneness has to do with value though. That seems a bit of a conceptual jump.

It certainly needs explaining. Oneness depends upon value because it’s only by seeking what’s truly Good that a being can be unified, as opposed to being the product of multiple and ultimately external determinants, such as appetite and ego (thumos). That’s why I cited Republic 443e, where Plato describes the soul’s becoming “one,” via reason. This is really the crucial turning point of the entire Republic. 

Appetite is external because it represents inherited biological programming, and ego is external inasmuch as it has to do with a person’s dealings with others. If anything is internal to us, it’s reason, by which we determine what’s truly Good (as opposed to what our appetites and our ego recommend). 

This Platonic notion of our unification through rational self-government is reiterated by Kant in his notion of rational autonomy as opposed to physical/biological heteronomy. 

I suspect that when Leibniz associates “reality” and “perfection” with “acts of reflection,” at Monadology par. 30, he has in mind the same thought: that it’s through reason (“reflection”), as opposed to mere physical interaction, that unity (“reality”) is achieved. 

You also say:

I can understand your complaint that natural sciences often abstract away from all this and just deal with things from the outside. But there is some describing from the outside to be done and it is fair that some people should do it. Moreover, those involved in dovetailing neuropsychology from neurophysiology are very much interested in the inside view as well. 

Of course external description needs to be done. The problem is when the external view is taken to be the sole locus of truth—as it is, for example, by Daniel Dennett (Thomas Nagel’s primary bete noire). 

I am aware of the emphasis that’s been put (contrary to Dennett) on inner experience by many neuroscientists in recent decades. This is what fuels the Consciousness Conference, and it’s very admirable. What’s missing from this whole discussion, however, is the side of inner experience that aims, in the way that I just described, at rational unification through the Good. And this isn’t a side issue, if it’s appropriate (as Plato, Hegel, and probably Leibniz think) to describe what’s rationally unified as more fully real, in the sense that it’s real as itself, than what’s not rationally unified. (This would be “reality” in the strong sense that Leibniz associates with “perfection.”)

If hegel says that Leibniz’s God is finite he must be wrong because Leibniz says He is not. Hegel must have slipped in a category mistake with his words - as so many philosophers do all the time. Leibniz is very rarely if ever guilty of this. 

Hegel is aware that Leibniz and many other thinkers describe their God as “infinite.” But if their God is also supposed to be a being that is distinct from the physical world, he is not (Hegel points out) truly infinite, because he is limited by not being the physical world! (This is Hegel’s critique of what he calls the “spurious infinity.”) Inasmuch as Leibniz describes his God as existing prior to the physical world and deciding whether or not to create that world, Leibniz’s conception seems to invite this Hegelian critique. 

This doesn’t mean that Hegel is a “pantheist” who makes God identical with the world. Rather, the truly infinite God is, as Hegel puts it, the finite world’s going beyond its finitude (via reason). (The “dynamic” non-dualistic relation that I mentioned previously.)

I tried to download your paper on Leibniz’s telicity from Researchgate, and failed. If you could send it to me privately as a pdf, I’d be interested to read it.

Best, Bob W

On Apr 12, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Edwards, Jonathan wrote:

Dear Robert,
My understanding is that Leibniz’s concepts of perfection (two) are reasonably objective, although we may not be able to adjudicate on one of them. [...]

Savitri Era Learning Forum: Understanding the self in a social context

Savitri Era Learning Forum: Humans are capable of high levels of misunderstanding

Feel Philosophy: Value and perfection are the goals at which the finite aims

Marketime: Narcissism reduces the exchange of information among team members

[The conceit that is specific to the reactionary mind, for Lilla, is the belief in a Golden Age.] #DonQuixote

[Nietzsche anticipating postmodernist thought. Yet, David Hume was demonstrating postmodernist 'tendencies'.]

[we need an enemy..Nationalism must thus always go to war with other nations, identity must vilify other identities]

ASSELINEAU et SHRI AUROBINDO  : même vision ! Contre une Europe nationa... via @YouTube

Rvw of #Hegel's India in Italian press @sole24ore by #SebastianoMaffettone: "L’uscita recentissima per Oxford University Press di un volu...

Savitri Era: Vedic undergirding Of Sri Aurobindo's Evolutionary dialectics
If the educated in India can't recognise the significance of an extraordinary book and its implications, it's tragic
History of Western Philosophy can no longer be understood as neatly as before as genealogy of Hegel's ideas seem to be imbricated with India
Internet has made possible unprecedented access to knowledge sources. One can read The Secret of the Veda free, here
Savitri Era: You are worse than a commie in your delusion #SriAurobindo #WorldUnion #SavitriEraParty #Frexit #Modian
Things seemed so straightforward as if milk & honey will flow in a decade or two. But all that stand shattered today

[How could one individual, tucked away in room, have a determining influence on a war involving millions of people?]

A fortnightly column reflecting on chapters of India’s political past that are relevant today.

[In the Name of Democracy: J.P. Movement and the Emergency, Bipan Chandra, Penguin paperback, p. 384, Rs. 350.]


Savitri Era Religious Fraternity: Devotees can upload audios at AuroMusic @auromusic_maa @istmgroup

Marketime: No man can surpass his own time

Reimagining and Refashioning Integral Management - Tusar Nath Mohapatra, Savitri Era Learning Forum (SELF) Ghaziabad › cities › apr
Science and religion in theosophy. By Sri Aurobindo | Express News Service | Published: 12th April 2017

No comments:

Post a Comment